Type R vs. Type S

Status
Not open for further replies.
salut, moi aussi je pense que tu ne te trompes pas avec une type-s tu vas voir tu ne seras pas décu, très bonne auto, pi cest plus luxueux!:bigup:
 
I would have to say Type-R, here is why (btw I own the R and test drove the S)

The R is more race oriented.

I haven't raced any modded type-S but in stock form they never pass me.

The aftermarket for the R is incredible, you will have to wait a couple of years for it to get as big for the DC5.

Some hate the loudness of the R but I love it...

It will be cheaper

All in all it depends on what you like ...raw performance or luxury, security of having a brand new car, modding the car or keeping it stock....
 
Originally posted by Br0kWRX


well said. I totally agree. :bigup:
Click to expand...

IMO... Actually the WRX has one of the nicest interiors i have ever seen!

I sortta like the interior of cars alot.. so i have to say it is very important.

The Rsx type S has a horrible looking interior. Whereas the Type R is very very sporty for a Race ready sporty coupe.
 
Originally posted by hid_kits69
its faster modified not stock though..
and on the highway its faster.
Click to expand...
well I agree also, an RSX-S with Header/test-pipe/full exaust and a CAI will be faster than a stock Type R . Mine anyways !
 
as HID_Kits said, the inside is just one aspect. You have to consider everything else, which exterior do you like better? I would prefer an ITR over the RSX-S, because of the better handling, but most of all it would be the exclusivity..
 
Car-Stats.com Report for 2002 Acura RSX Type-S
Obtained from C&D August, 2001
0-60: 6.1 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 14.8
1/4 Speed: 95
Additional Information

0-30: 2.4
0-40: 3.5
0-50: 4.7
0-70: 8
0-80: 10.2
0-90: 12.9
0-100: 16.4
0-110: 20.3
0-120: 27.2
0-130:
0-140:
0-150:
0-160:
 
If you want a car that feels and drives like a sports car, get the Type R..


The Type S is way to mellowed out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top