color me surprised still, looks way bigger... for some reason... man... most people that owned one seem not to have had a good experience... as for telling me to buy an r32... I just said I'd be okay with the acceleration of a 2cv... you realize what a 2cv is right?
this is a 2cv
it does 0-100 in 27 seconds... 27... do you really thing I would go for an r32... on a m model bmw... plus that year model was nice looking.. in 1995... that's almost 20 years ago... and has nothing of a classic look... so It looked good for 5 years... and will never look good anymore.
having said all that... still thinking about it... any clue about the 1.8? is it even availabl in the 2005+ model and fully equiped?
I know it's older... butdammit... guess I'll listen to you guys... seen many pleased people on car review sites... but the ones that weren't pleased, weren't please AS FUARK!!!... dammit... now what? what HB could give me the same options for about the same cost? really loved the look of it too... especially the cluster... for 2005+ models, really hated the pre 2005 model)
dammit... guess I'll listen to you guys... seen many pleased people on car review sites... but the ones that weren't pleased, weren't please AS FUARK!!!... dammit... now what? what HB could give me the same options for about the same cost? really loved the look of it too... especially the cluster... for 2005+ models, really hated the pre 2005 model)
Like I said, find yourself a clean Mazda 3 Sport GT, they came very well equipped, very modern interior also (for a 05-06 compact). Interior is miles ahead of that C-Class coupe IMO.
the C30 is a good option as well but the interior is more old-school.
The C30 seems like a nice option. It's too bad BMW dropped the 318TI so early here (they got the E46 TI in Europe), it was really a nice drive.
The C30 isn't old school at all, it's scandinavian's finesse at it's best. And although the trunk is small, the rear seats aren't that bad for a coupe.
I was looking at the S40 and they are quite cheap now, but I guess the maintenance cost is on the high side (especially for a reworked Focus).
There are also the non turbo engines, which may be easier to maintain. But I think that the S40/C30 share their chassis with the Mazda 3 and Focus no? I don't know if it means it's cheaper to maintain (suspension and direction parts) than a bigger Volvo or if doesn't change much?! I undestand that a T5 AWD is quite more expensive than a NA FWD to maintain.
maintenance is the same as a Volvo 850 or anything with the T5 engine, timing belt with waterpump and tensionner will run ya 550-700$ and 250$ if you do the labor yourself, you just need the Camshaft locker tool (to prevent the cams from moving).
it's litteraly the same engine as the 2.3L turbo 5cyl 20valve from 1994, just .2L bigger after 2001.
maintenance becomes higher on those platforms when they are AWD, obviously double the axles, add a t-case and driveshaft etc etc etc.
I do not see the old school in here....