Canada vs US gun ownership rates vs violent crimes

El Maestro said:
Non, ya eu 100 threads sans aucun argument valide. Ya eu 100 threads dans lesquels, les anti gun comme toi ne fesaient que reagir comme Piers Morgan et/ou des fillettes qui crient pour avoir le decu sur la conversation.
Click to expand...

C est ca le probleme avec les pro guns (comme toi dans ce cas), vous vous pensez plus intelligent que tout le monde, si ya quelqu un qui ne pense pas comme vous, c est toute des tapettes qui ont peur des armes et ils veulent vous enlever votre droit.

Je suis ni pro ni anti gun en passant.
 
theoutsider said:
C est ca le probleme avec les pro guns (comme toi dans ce cas), vous vous pensez plus intelligent que tout le monde, si ya quelqu un qui ne pense pas comme vous, c est toute des tapettes qui ont peur des armes et ils veulent vous enlever votre droit.

Je suis ni pro ni anti gun en passant.
Click to expand...

Jai pas dis qu'etre anti gun = tapette.

Jai dis que les anti gun ne fesaient que faire du bruit sans rien dire de pertinent.

Dans tous les threads, un anti gun ca se resume a quelqq'un qui bouche ses oreilles et quii se met a crier LALALALALALALALALALALALAALALALA
 
BlueDSM said:
Pretty much sums it all up.

I got an idea, why don't the anti-gun people just stop worrying about firearms (we have no gun problem in Canada kids, relax), and the pro gun people just continue to keep buying and enjoying their guns?

I know, sounds crazy! But for some reason I think everyone will be happy.
Click to expand...

Great idea except we law abiding citizens are being punished for the actions of lowlife criminals because when it comes to crime the system can't get wood. But when it comes to ordinary law abiding citizens they will manage to pop 2 or 3 Viagra to fuck us.

And now porcine's tampon fell out, so we need to permanently etch some phaggy time Kebekistan serial numbers on them reducing their value to 1/5?

The onus is not on gun owners to prove that gun ownership is safe. It is on the system to prove that it is unsafe. And it is the system's responsibility to lock up criminals

They have done neither.

Gun control doesn't work, and it never has.
 
wshockley said:
Great idea except we law abiding citizens are being punished for the actions of lowlife criminals because when it comes to crime the system can't get wood. But when it comes to ordinary law abiding citizens they will manage to pop 2 or 3 Viagra to fuck us.

And now porcine's tampon fell out, so we need to permanently etch some phaggy time Kebekistan serial numbers on them reducing their value to 1/5?

The onus is not on gun owners to prove that gun ownership is safe. It is on the system to prove that it is unsafe. And it is the system's responsibility to lock up criminals

They have done neither.

Gun control doesn't work, and it never has.
Click to expand...

I think I was misunderstood, I wasn't referring to adopting this principal in the global sense, but more "local", as in inclusively in this forum.
It just seems like these threads just bring up the usual suspects, who just argue with each other with no purpose.

But understand that I'm not saying to give up the good fight, trust me, I'm on the same side as you and I'm patiently waiting to see what kind of civil group I can join to derail porcine (as should any useful tax-paying citizen of QC) - But this forum is a waste of time and energy when it comes to trying to have a discussion with the anti-guns on here who are either really young and/or naive, or old socialists that should just die off already.

Why dumb yourself down to their level?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top