Climate slowdown means extreme rates of warming 'not as likely' (BBC)

od_man99

New member
_67671645_c0150529-antarctic_iceberg-spl.jpg


Scientists say the recent downturn in the rate of global warming will lead to lower temperature rises in the short-term.

Since 1998, there has been an unexplained "standstill" in the heating of the Earth's atmosphere.

Writing in Nature Geoscience, the researchers say this will reduce predicted warming in the coming decades.

But long-term, the expected temperature rises will not alter significantly.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

The most extreme projections are looking less likely than before”

Dr Alexander Otto University of Oxford

The slowdown in the expected rate of global warming has been studied for several years now. Earlier this year, the UK Met Office lowered their five-year temperature forecast.

But this new paper gives the clearest picture yet of how any slowdown is likely to affect temperatures in both the short-term and long-term.

An international team of researchers looked at how the last decade would impact long-term, equilibrium climate sensitivity and the shorter term climate response.
Transient nature

Climate sensitivity looks to see what would happen if we doubled concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere and let the Earth's oceans and ice sheets respond to it over several thousand years.

Transient climate response is much shorter term calculation again based on a doubling of CO2.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported in 2007 that the short-term temperature rise would most likely be 1-3C (1.8-5.4F).

But in this new analysis, by only including the temperatures from the last decade, the projected range would be 0.9-2.0C.
Ice The report suggests that warming in the near term will be less than forecast

"The hottest of the models in the medium-term, they are actually looking less likely or inconsistent with the data from the last decade alone," said Dr Alexander Otto from the University of Oxford.

"The most extreme projections are looking less likely than before."

The authors calculate that over the coming decades global average temperatures will warm about 20% more slowly than expected.

But when it comes to the longer term picture, the authors say their work is consistent with previous estimates. The IPCC said that climate sensitivity was in the range of 2.0-4.5C.
Ocean storage

This latest research, including the decade of stalled temperature rises, produces a range of 0.9-5.0C.

"It is a bigger range of uncertainty," said Dr Otto.

"But it still includes the old range. We would all like climate sensitivity to be lower but it isn't."

The researchers say the difference between the lower short-term estimate and the more consistent long-term picture can be explained by the fact that the heat from the last decade has been absorbed into and is being stored by the world's oceans.

Not everyone agrees with this perspective.

Prof Steven Sherwood, from the University of New South Wales, says the conclusion about the oceans needs to be taken with a grain of salt for now.

"There is other research out there pointing out that this storage may be part of a natural cycle that will eventually reverse, either due to El Nino or the so-called Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, and therefore may not imply what the authors are suggesting," he said.

The authors say there are ongoing uncertainties surrounding the role of aerosols in the atmosphere and around the issue of clouds.

"We would expect a single decade to jump around a bit but the overall trend is independent of it, and people should be exactly as concerned as before about what climate change is doing," said Dr Otto.

Is there any succour in these findings for climate sceptics who say the slowdown over the past 14 years means the global warming is not real?

"None. No comfort whatsoever," he said.

Follow Matt on Twitter.

Climate slowdown means extreme rates of warming 'not as likely'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22567023
 
Bottom, l etre humain est en PARTIE responsable des changements climatiques. On ne sait juste pas a quel point on a un impact.

Ca change pas le fait qu'on doit changer notre mode de vie mais surtout ameliorer plusieurs choses.
 
^Yes it does. All the greenwashing our governments do is to increase taxes, the more studies come out to discredit the anthropogenic global warming movement, the better. Gore said in 01, that we would be under water by 2010, here we are.
 
ouin mais t'as poste un article qui dit et je cite
Scientists say the recent downturn in the rate of global warming will lead to lower temperature rises in the short-term.

rises ....

a pis montre nous donc ca cette citation de Al Gore ....
 
^Yes it does. All the greenwashing our governments do is to increase taxes, the more studies come out to discredit the anthropogenic global warming movement, the better. Gore said in 01, that we would be under water by 2010, here we are.

No it doesnt.

Je dis pas qu'on doit taxer la pollution. Pas du tout, je dis qu'on doit changer notre facon de vivre. Changer la technologie, raffiner nos procédures etc etc.

Faut etre VRAIMENT con pour pretendre que l etre humain na pas d'impact sur la planete.

T'es pas capable d'etre ouvert d'esprit toi ein... Pour toi c'est noir ou blanc, des qu'on parle de pollution, d'environnement et d'avenir sur la terre tu jumpes automatiquement a AL GORE, TAXES, SCAM, NWO et mind control de la population.

Pourquoi t'es pas capable de l'admettre que les humains fuckent la planete, pourquoi?
 
No it doesnt.

Je dis pas qu'on doit taxer la pollution. Pas du tout, je dis qu'on doit changer notre facon de vivre. Changer la technologie, raffiner nos procédures etc etc.

Faut etre VRAIMENT con pour pretendre que l etre humain na pas d'impact sur la planete.

T'es pas capable d'etre ouvert d'esprit toi ein... Pour toi c'est noir ou blanc, des qu'on parle de pollution, d'environnement et d'avenir sur la terre tu jumpes automatiquement a AL GORE, TAXES, SCAM, NWO et mind control de la population.

Pourquoi t'es pas capable de l'admettre que les humains fuckent la planete, pourquoi?

monsieur est un ingenieur en qqchose qu'on s'en calice ... il ne peut avouer un seul jour avoir eu tord en quelque chose ... ca fait partie de sa religion d'ingenieur
 
No it doesnt.

Je dis pas qu'on doit taxer la pollution. Pas du tout, je dis qu'on doit changer notre facon de vivre. Changer la technologie, raffiner nos procédures etc etc.

Faut etre VRAIMENT con pour pretendre que l etre humain na pas d'impact sur la planete.

T'es pas capable d'etre ouvert d'esprit toi ein... Pour toi c'est noir ou blanc, des qu'on parle de pollution, d'environnement et d'avenir sur la terre tu jumpes automatiquement a AL GORE, TAXES, SCAM, NWO et mind control de la population.

Pourquoi t'es pas capable de l'admettre que les humains fuckent la planete, pourquoi?

i cant see a way out . unless we eventually move to other planets , earth will some day be saturated with humans with no room to fit any more , what shall we do then ? no matter what you do short of leaving earth , there is nothing we can do vs overpopulation unless....
 
No it doesnt.

Je dis pas qu'on doit taxer la pollution. Pas du tout, je dis qu'on doit changer notre facon de vivre. Changer la technologie, raffiner nos procédures etc etc.

Faut etre VRAIMENT con pour pretendre que l etre humain na pas d'impact sur la planete.

T'es pas capable d'etre ouvert d'esprit toi ein... Pour toi c'est noir ou blanc, des qu'on parle de pollution, d'environnement et d'avenir sur la terre tu jumpes automatiquement a AL GORE, TAXES, SCAM, NWO et mind control de la population.

Pourquoi t'es pas capable de l'admettre que les humains fuckent la planete, pourquoi?

Your head is so far up your ass you actually believe what you write.

Where did I say humans aren't destroying the Earth? Point it out you giant turd.
 
So many articles going every which way. I'm at the point that I don't give a flying f*ck anymore about global climate (yes I understand the impact),
if it's 25 degrees tomorrow, i'll deal with it accordingly, if it's -25 tomorrow, I'll deal with it accordingly as well.
 
Your head is so far up your ass you actually believe what you write.

Where did I say humans aren't destroying the Earth? Point it out you giant turd.

''Ca change pas le fait qu'on doit changer notre mode de vie mais surtout ameliorer plusieurs choses''

Tu me reponds '' Yes it does''

Donc je te reviens avec ca, tu me dis en gros qu'on a pas besoin de changer quoi que ce soit. C'est pas de notre faute, c est un cycle naturel de la terre (de refroidissement ou rechauffement, appelle le comme tu veux)
 
^ oui je comprends ce que tu veux dire.

Outsider we are destroying the planet. GMO, nuclear waste, eutrophication or our lakes, destruction of air standards, aluminum contamination, water contamination etc..

CO2 is the last thing we should be looking at.
 
Back
Top