When Alex Jones visit the BBC

^In. Excellent response by Alex. The British need to wake up. Get out of your fucking trance, they are destroying our way of life and we are standing by.
 
i like the response from the host when the reporter from the times asked if alex was; 1-full of BS or 2- part of it and the host said 2.

surprised he would say that unless he was joking around... kinda makes me wonder if this is all theatrics on both sides.
 
od_man99 said:
Yes I do. I fully agree with him on 90% of the issues.
Click to expand...

I agree with a lot of your posts & do see that Alex does say real shit sometimes.

Although, many people don't take Alex seriously. That's the point, even though he says some truths. He says a lot of bullshit too & acts way over the top. I believe he is put there to make "conspiracy theorists" look like crazy internet conspiracy idiots.

Just look at the last 5 minutes of his Piers Morgan interview. Anybody watching that will think "so all these kids today who believe in 'conspiracy theories' all get their info from this wacko!?"
 
Everyone who opposes the NWO is apparently "crazy" and should be hospitalized. People capable of critical thinking are a threat, call them nutjobs and discredit everything they're saying instead.

Typical bullshit.
 
Although I despise the likes of Alex jones who blow everything out of proportion and completely make up or misinterpret 90% of the information they convey, what the governments are doing is fucking wrong. It's disgusting.

It's literally big brother. They record who you call, when you called them, where you were, and where the other person was. That's a huge violation of my (and your) privacy. I don't do anything illegal, as a matter of fact I despise crime and criminals, but that's exactly why the government has no business gathering data on me without a warrant issued by a judge or my consent as per due process of law.

I'm no conspiracy theorist nor am I paranoid, but I'm pretty sure that whatever they do with the data they collect had more to do with spying on law abiding citizens, circumventing due process of law, than catching terrorists.

Even if the government does indeed only use the data on specific targeted terrorist suspects (which I'm pretty sure they don't), I'm not sure that the effectiveness the program warrants the ASTRONOMICAL COSTS surely associated with such large scale data capturing operation. It's our (taxpayer) money being spent, there should be accountability. They should demonstrate the effectiveness by showing us results (which most likely don't exist).

Either way, I'm all for security and upholding the law, and that in itself includes upholding the laws that protect citizens from being arbitrarily investigated without due process or probable cause.
 
^Mostly agree with what you wrote.

This is just the same as the government who tries to ''protect you'' from what might happen if you ''fall'' face first.

When does the ''we have to protect people, you have to stay safe'' ever stops? If you cannot live your own life without being afraid of what MIGHT happen, how stupid is it to be alive and safe if youre no longer free?

When does one part stops being more important than the other?
 
Ce n'est pas tant le sujet qu'il tente d'aborder le problème, c'est ça manière de l'exprimer. Il ressemble à un gros ourang outan en rut. Rien de plus vulgaire et méprisant que quelqu'un qui te coupe la parole et qui t'empêche de terminer tes phrases et qui en plus parle vraiment trop fort.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top