El Maestro
New member
ca va être un sequel logique de BF2. BF BC c'était une extension pas rapport.
BF3 ca va être fuckin epic.
BF3 ca va être fuckin epic.
I wonder how much this game is going to demand on computers to be able to play on maxed settings
I hope they put jets and big map. That what's missing in bc2
trailers always look good until you actually play the game.
BF-BC2 was garbage.
Saw this on IGN yesterday, looks good indeed but like bigtuffguy said, it always looks better in the trailers
If the reviews are good i will most definitely buy it
I just find the gameplay is too slow, the maps are too big, and snipers can't prone.
i have a quad Q6600 @ 2.4
4 gig ram
65gig SSD
Radeon 4590 ( i think it's that one, it was second best when I bought it)
win 7 64
I just find the gameplay is too slow, the maps are too big, and snipers can't prone.
i have a quad Q6600 @ 2.4
4 gig ram
65gig SSD
Radeon 4590 ( i think it's that one, it was second best when I bought it)
win 7 64
Probably nothing worse than Crysis 2 or any other DX11 FPS game. I've played the crysis 2 demo and my 6970 runs it at around 60 fps EVERYTHING Maxed @ full HD. Infact, It runs twice as good as crysis 1 due to being DX11, Crysis runs at like 35fps for me with everything maxed. Crysis 1 was a hell of a huge resource hog because of DX 10.1, DX11 is soooooooooooooo much smoother man. It also depends on the graphic engine, Metro 2033 runs at about 35 fps for me too but the game is also another resource hog, Rift plays around 40 fps for me.
It's going be epic, the Frostbite 2 engine is really impressive. I honestly hope the maps won't be too big. Big maps = relying to much on vehicles and too many camping snipers.
????
Crysis 2 MP demo is DX9 only. A DX11 patch will eventually follow the release of the game. The fact that it runs better than Crysis 1 it's because of CryEngine 3. Actually you should expect the game to run slower with the DX11 patch, tesselation and more advanced DoF effects like Metro 2033 has will take a toll on the system for sure.
Graphiquement, sa d'laire assez mongole !!
Moi j'adore,qu'est-ce que tu n'aime pas de ce jeux?
Did you ever play any other battlefield? I find the maps are too small sometimes, Laguna alta and presa are ridiculously small on conquest. Panama and atacama are mid sized, I absolutely love harvest day and heavy metal(2 new maps) If you haven't previously played any other BF series I can understand why you don't like it, You're too used to the laziness of shitty CoD/CS/Quake/Unreal with their terribly small "arena" type maps.
I also do hate the fact that snipers don't get prone - However this is Bad Company specifically a strategy/swat type game where you're supposed to go all out offensive push, I do like sniping though... The bullet drop is wicked! Harvest and Heavy metal are Massive maps and you really need to know wtf you're doing when you snipe on those.
What pisses me off about BFBC 2 is that there's WAY too much 11 years old Wanna-be-bob-lee-swaggers.
I mean, when i play Conquest, and that we get redlined (Out numbered because of rage quitters, then other team litterally camps on your spawn,) all i see if 3/4 of my fucking team hanging back with Sniper Rifles instead of pushing back to get objectives.
When you play rush it's even worse, when on offense team, i still have half of my team camping like retards with sniper rifles, and they can't shoot for shit, leaving those who actually try to take objectives hopelessly outnumbered.
To all sniper rifle users here, if you CAN'T get a one-shoot hit in the CHEST OR ABOVE, use another weapon, for fuck's sake.
^^u mad buddy? lol.
I'm a sniper by the way and I only shoot to kill. I never take a shot if it I'm not 100% it's going to end in a casualty. I also rarely die...
only thing that is going to suck is the fact that I play on console and console is limited to 24...